buree |
|
| CITAZIONE (TheAnzerKillsEmAll @ 25/8/2011, 19:05) Mosca perchè sei un porco comunista, ovvio. wrong as usual... e ne sei pure cosciente stavolta! CITAZIONE (TheAnzerKillsEmAll @ 25/8/2011, 19:05) Anyway, am I the one who failed to address anything? Mick, seriously, are you kidding me?
I simply told you that 2 weeks is way to long...it's you who refuse to explain why YOU CHOSE TO DOUBLE THE REAL NHL 1 WEEK IR. Just tell us why, you childish dickhead, and quit playing like a jerk. Even though, you could be role model as jerk. CITAZIONE (buree @ 3/7/2011, 23:03) Last year prognosis needed to be player out at least 10days to become eligible for IR. The ensuing minimum period of IR stay was 2 weeks mainly because we wanted to discourage GMs from cheating on that: we use autocertification and if the player was actually supposed to miss only 1 week, putting him on IR would have a significant drawback even if going unnoticed by the league.
Using 1 week as minimum period of stay on IR (and 1 week of absence as prognosis) would certainly mean many more players going to IR. I'm sure those here asking for the 1week period are ready to help checking out the status of hundreds of players put on IR during the season, right?
if that's the case, AND if the teams logs page is fixed and finally working on our league site, then i guess we could go that route. non so perché ma avevo la sensazione di averla già postata sta roba cmq x quel che mi riguarda se ne riparla Lunedì!
|
| |